Politically exposed person (PEP)
ExecutiveLevel 1Former
Apex of state power — head of state/government, cabinet, apex judiciary, top military/intelligence, central bank governor.
- Position
- Pope
- Government branch
- Executive (B1)
- Dates in office
- 0686-10-27 – 0687-09-21
Retained as a PEP reference for 50 years after leaving office — this record is past that retention window. A PEP flag requires enhanced due diligence, not asset-freezing — it is not an allegation of wrongdoing. See our politically exposed persons reference guide for how the seniority levels, government branches, and current/former decay model work.
Enhanced due diligence
Enhanced Due Diligence Report
Standard EDD attentionas of 2026-07-09
FreshnessGenerated from source data as of 2026-07-09 — the date this record was last observed in the Wikidata — Global PEPs (all countries + international organizations). The report regenerates when the underlying source data changes. wd_peps List-version anchorList version wd_peps@2026-07-09; manifest SHA-256 97dd2edea227ba1d… (signing pending). No published verification manifest yet — shown honestly as pending, never fabricated. wd_peps This is an automatically generated screening and research aid, not certified enhanced due diligence. It is compiled from the official public sources cited on this page and reflects those sources as of the date shown — it is not legal advice and not a determination that this person presents, or does not present, risk. A PEP flag indicates a prominent public function requiring enhanced due diligence — a source-attributed classification, not an allegation of wrongdoing and not a sanction. Statements that nothing was found reflect our sources as of the check date and are not a clearance. The regulated institution remains solely responsible for its own due diligence, risk rating, senior-management approval, and source-of-funds verification. Verify independently.
S2 Identity & biographical profile
Known aliasesOnly the primary name variant is published by Wikidata — Global PEPs (all countries + international organizations).
Date of birthNot published by source (Wikidata — Global PEPs (all countries + international organizations)).
IdentifiersNone published by our sources.
S3 Position, public function & influence
Seniority (why this office matters)Level 1 — Apex of state power — head of state/government, cabinet, apex judiciary, top military/intelligence, central bank governor. wd_pepsmethodology Term(s) in office0686-10-27 – 0687-09-21 wd_peps StatusFormer — the source records an end of tenure. Derived from occupancy dates, never hand-set. wd_pepsmethodology S4 PEP classification & methodology
ClassificationLevel 1 (Executive) — Apex of state power — head of state/government, cabinet, apex judiciary, top military/intelligence, central bank governor. wd_pepsmethodology This is a source-attributed classification requiring enhanced due diligence — not an allegation of wrongdoing and not a sanction. The public methodology (levels, branches, decay model) is documented in our politically-exposed-persons reference guide, linked in the source registry below.
Retention & decayOnce former, this classification is retained for 50 years after leaving office (the Level 1 retention window); this record is past that window and is shown lapsed. EU AMLD requires enhanced measures to continue for at least 12 months after a PEP leaves office; the retention windows applied here are deliberately longer. methodologyEU AMLD S5 Sanctions & watchlist cross-check
No sanctions or watchlist match found in our resolved corpus for this record as of 2026-07-09 (list version wd_peps@2026-07-09). This is not a clearance: it reflects our sources and our precision-first resolution method, and does not discharge an institution's own screening obligations.
S6 Relatives & close associates (RCA)
No relatives or close associates are recorded in our sources as of 2026-07-09. This reflects our current source coverage — not a finding that none exist. FATF R.12 extends EDD obligations to relatives and close associates; institutions must establish these through their own KYC.
S7 Jurisdiction & country-risk context
Jurisdiction of office / nationalityVA wd_peps Country-risk indicators (FATF grey/black-list status, corruption perception index): not yet assessed in this report as of 2026-07-09.
S8 EDD obligation indicators
Indicated EDD postureStandard EDD attention. A deterministic, non-numeric statement of which enhanced-due-diligence obligations published regulation attaches to the published classification facts listed below — not a risk score, not a verdict on this person, and not a substitute for the institution's own risk rating. rubricFATF R.12 InputSanctions cross-check: no confirmed designation in our resolved corpus as of 2026-07-09 (see the cross-check section; not a clearance).
InputJurisdiction country-risk status: not yet assessed (Phase 3 input; when assessed, a FATF-listed jurisdiction elevates the band one step).
Rubric v1.0.0Band derivation (deterministic, code-owned): seniority sets the base band (Level 1 → Higher; Level 2 → Elevated; Level 3 and RCA → Standard); a former office-holder still within the retention window steps down one band; a former office-holder past the retention window rests at Standard; a resolver-confirmed sanctions designation always sets the top band; an unconfirmed current/former status never lowers the band. FATF-listed-jurisdiction elevation is not yet an input (country-risk indicators are not yet assessed). No numeric score exists anywhere in this derivation.
FATF Recommendation 12 attaches four mandatory measures to foreign PEPs — risk-management systems to determine PEP status; senior-management approval for the relationship; reasonable measures to establish source of wealth and source of funds; and enhanced ongoing monitoring — and applies them to domestic PEPs and international-organisation officials on a risk-sensitive basis. Whether this person is a foreign or a domestic PEP depends on the institution's own jurisdiction, which this report cannot know. FATF R.12 The institution's own risk rating, senior-management approval, and source-of-funds verification remain its sole responsibility (see the standing notice above).
S9 Source of wealth / source of funds
Not assessed. Source-of-wealth and source-of-funds verification are obligations the regulated institution performs on customer-provided information (FATF R.12(c); EU AMLR Art. 42). They cannot be supplied by a screening-data vendor and are outside the scope of this screening aid.
S11 Ongoing monitoring & freshness
Observation windowFirst observed 2026-07-09; last confirmed 2026-07-09. wd_peps Source confirmationConfirmed present in Wikidata — Global PEPs (all countries + international organizations) list version wd_peps@2026-07-09, observed 2026-07-09. wd_peps Decay / retentionRetention posture: former office-holder past the 50-year retention window — retained as a lapsed reference record. methodology What changes here: this report regenerates whenever the underlying source data for this record changes, in the same daily refresh that drives customer re-screening. Unchanged source data produces a byte-identical report — the freshness line above is the tell.
Institutions that need change alerts on this record can use the screening API's continuous monitoring — see the API section of the About page (/about/#api).
S12 Sources, provenance & citations
Every factual claim in this report carries a citation resolving to a row of the registry below — dataset, issuing authority, license, confidence tier, record observation dates, and list version with manifest hash. A machine-checkable gate rejects any report containing an uncited factual claim.
How to citeHow to cite this report: “Conon — Enhanced Due Diligence Report (ProofAML), as of 2026-07-09. https://proofaml.com/people/conon-nk9afaf458/#edd-report — reflects the official sources listed in the registry.”
S13 Correction & dispute path
Our errorIf our data mishandles the source — a wrong merge, a stale field, a mis-parsed record — request a correction via /about/#corrections or corrections@proofaml.com. Corrections are acknowledged and resolved within 5 business days.
Source errorIf the underlying official record is wrong, the issuing authority listed in the source registry above owns that record — we reflect official lists and are not the issuing authority.
Report errorIf this report misstates the facts shown in its cited sources, report it via the same correction queue; it is treated as a generation defect (bug severity), and any generated narrative content is pulled to template-only immediately on receipt while investigated.
Automatically generated screening and research aid — not certified due diligence, not an allegation of wrongdoing, not a sanction, and never a clearance. Verify independently.
This page reflects the official Wikidata — Global PEPs (all countries + international organizations), version wd_peps@2026-07-09, as observed on 2026-07-09. ProofAML is not the issuing authority.
Request a correction or dispute (distinguishes a data-handling error on our side from the underlying official designation, which is the issuing authority's record).