What a match means
A hit on one list is a block; on another it is enhanced due diligence; on a third it is a note for the file. Source-context spells out the action each list actually implies, so nobody over- or under-calls a match.
The risk-based AML assessment platform
ProofAML is where a compliance team runs the whole loop — screen, assess, document, and monitor — against one transparent, source-cited corpus. The data is the substrate; the decision and its defensibility are the product.
One consolidated corpusEvery record cited to its authorityRuns in your browser
The one workflow
One corpus, narrated as a single loop instead of a pile of datasets. Each stage is a capability we already run — shown here at its honest, shipped status.
Is this party on a list?
Run a name against the consolidated corpus — sanctions, PEP, and law-enforcement families kept deliberately distinct, never conflated into one score.
Faceted name & alias search, in your browserWhat does the match mean — and how risky is it?
Source-context tells you what a hit on this list implies. PEP tiering says how exposed the person is; relationship edges surface who stands behind them.
Source-context · PEP tiers · RCA · EDD reportProve the work.
Turn the assessment into a defensible record: a case, a reason-coded disposition, and a maker/checker decision with an audit event behind every call.
Case workspace · disposition · audit eventTell me when something changes.
Re-screen the book of business as lists change; surface newly designated, modified, and delisted parties over time.
Change feed & re-screen — on the roadmapAssess · the differentiator
A raw data feed hands you a row and stops. The assess stage is the part a feed cannot do: it tells the analyst what the hit actually means and how exposed the subject is.
A hit on one list is a block; on another it is enhanced due diligence; on a third it is a note for the file. Source-context spells out the action each list actually implies, so nobody over- or under-calls a match.
A 9-branch PEP taxonomy with Level 1/2/3 tiers, current vs. former status, and retention windows — derived at render. Relationship edges surface the relatives and close associates behind a name, from official sources only.
The enhanced-due-diligence report assembles jurisdiction, source lineage, PEP tier, and the ownership control-graph into a single printable dossier — with country-risk scoring deepening as it rolls out.
Sanctions, PEP, and law-enforcement records stay three distinct kinds of thing — a binding prohibition, a risk classification, and an unproven allegation. Different actions, never conflated.
Document · the durable moat
This is the MLRO's and the auditor's stage — the part a screening-only tool never gives you: proof, two years later, that the work was done and followed policy.
Every alert can become a case with a reason-coded disposition and a four-eyes (maker/checker) decision — each recorded as an audit event. Cleared or escalated, the reasoning is captured, not lost.
Hash-chained decision log & SAR-ready export are on the roadmap.
Schematic of the recorded trail — not a real case.
Proof · credibility of method
The sharpest live differentiator is transparency: we enumerate the per-upstream license we redistribute under, source by source — rather than flattening everything into one aggregate license.
ProofAML is not the issuing authority — it is the citable copy of record. Every entry names the list that issued it, its program, the list version, and the date we observed it, so a compliance team can trace any decision back to its source. Honest scale is shown as evidence of method, not a scoreboard.
Built for your regime
An MLRO's first trust question. The landing adapts its regulator framing by market — pick your edition, and the obligations, sources, and statutes reframe to the authorities you answer to.
Who it's for
Nobody wants a PEP taxonomy; they want to decide and defend. Each role lives in a stage of the workflow.
Clear or escalate this alert quickly and correctly — without over- or under-calling it.
Stand behind my team's decisions to a regulator, and know my program covers the regimes I'm liable under.
Screen every new customer and counterparty at onboarding, and route the exceptions.
Reconstruct why a past decision was made, and whether it followed policy.
No account, no upload leaves your machine — the screening tool runs entirely in your browser and sends no analytics.
We publish what is shipped and clearly label what is forthcoming. ProofAML is not an issuing authority; each page reflects an official public source as observed on a stated date, and every designation traces to the list version it came from. Individuals sought by law enforcement are presumed innocent. Data under CC BY 4.0.