DOJ enforcement press release · document record

Employee Who Fraudulently Embezzled Approximately $4 Million From Big Ten Network Sentenced 28 Months in Prison and Ordered To Repay FundsArticle

Source-verifiedReflects U.S. Department of Justice press releasepublished not an issuing authority

This is the U.S. Department of Justice's own published account of an enforcement matter. A criminal charge is an allegation. Any defendant named in the text is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law. This record labels a matter, not a person, and does not assert any individual's guilt. ProofAML is not the issuing authority.

Release details

Date published
Issuing DOJ office / component
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); USAO - Illinois, Northern
Topic / offense category
  • Fraud
Publisher
U.S. Department of Justice
Official source (justice.gov)
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndil/pr/employee-who-fraudulently-embezzled-approximately-4-million-big-ten-network-sentenced

Summary

A long-time employee of the Big Ten Network, WESTON GOLDSTEIN, fraudulently embezzled more than $4 million over an eight-year period by using company funds to purchase electronic devices for his own personal benefit.

Source & how to cite

Employee Who Fraudulently Embezzled Approximately $4 Million From Big Ten Network Sentenced 28 Months in Prison and Ordered To Repay Funds. U.S. Department of Justice, 2026-07-22. Reproduced by ProofAML as an enforcement-matter document record. Official source: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndil/pr/employee-who-fraudulently-embezzled-approximately-4-million-big-ten-network-sentenced. URL: https://proofaml.com/articles/employee-who-fraudulently-embezzled-approximately-4-million-from-big-ten-network-doj1a33b07a1fab/

Source: U.S. Department of Justice (justice.gov), public domain (17 U.S.C. §105). Citation of the Department of Justice as source is appreciated.

This page reflects a U.S. Department of Justice press release as observed on . It is a document record of what the Department published; it is not an independent finding by ProofAML, and it is not a court judgment.

Request a correction or dispute (distinguishes a data-handling error on our side from the underlying DOJ publication, which is the Department's record).