ProofAMLSanctions Registry
EDITION · 2026-07-28102,645 records observedScreen a name

Home / Enforcement press releases / dojf3d015428b03

DOJ enforcement press release · document record

Former Bank Employee Admits Stealing More Than $125,000 from Elderly Customer with DementiaArticle

Source-verifiedReflects U.S. Department of Justice press releasepublished not an issuing authority

This is the U.S. Department of Justice's own published account of an enforcement matter. A criminal charge is an allegation. Any defendant named in the text is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law. This record labels a matter, not a person, and does not assert any individual's guilt. ProofAML is not the issuing authority.

Release details

Date published
Issuing DOJ office / component
USAO - Rhode Island
Topic / offense category
  • Elder Justice
  • Financial Fraud
DOJ press-release number
26-44
Publisher
U.S. Department of Justice
Official source (justice.gov)
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ri/pr/former-bank-employee-admits-stealing-more-125000-elderly-customer-dementia

Summary

PROVIDENCE – A former employee of Santander Bank has pleaded guilty in federal court to charges related to stealing more than $125,000 from the bank account of a 78-year-old customer with dementia.

Source & how to cite

Former Bank Employee Admits Stealing More Than $125,000 from Elderly Customer with Dementia. U.S. Department of Justice, 2026-05-06. Reproduced by ProofAML as an enforcement-matter document record. Official source: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ri/pr/former-bank-employee-admits-stealing-more-125000-elderly-customer-dementia. URL: https://proofaml.com/articles/former-bank-employee-admits-stealing-more-than-125-000-from-elderly-customer-with-dementia-dojf3d015428b03/

Source: U.S. Department of Justice (justice.gov), public domain (17 U.S.C. §105). Citation of the Department of Justice as source is appreciated.

This page reflects a U.S. Department of Justice press release as observed on . It is a document record of what the Department published; it is not an independent finding by ProofAML, and it is not a court judgment.

Request a correction or dispute (distinguishes a data-handling error on our side from the underlying DOJ publication, which is the Department's record).